Before joining Royal Holloway, I collaborated in a GCRF funded project led by the University of Leeds. This international project brought together academics and researches from Keele University, Lancaster University, ICIPE, FANRAPAN and the Nelson Mandela African Institute to develop sustainable pathways for upscaling biocontrol interventions in sub-Saharan Africa and embed them in national agricultural policies. The main objectives of the project were to:
-Identify how biocontrol interventions have been successfully adopted and understand the bottlenecks to further adoption.
-Identify barriers to access of key inputs required, such as seeds and biocontrol agents, and initiate commercialisation opportunities
-Explore how farmer-farmer networking can be facilitated using a prototype mobile phone-based information sharing system in the context of country-dependent farmer-led communication pathways.
To achieve this we carried out a synthetic map and meta-analysis of the adoption and effectiveness of biocontrol practices in sub-saharan Africa.
The systematic map revealed that cereals, particularly maize, were the most studied crop (59%).Research on botanical pesticides constituted 32% of the studies, followed by augmentation/introduction biocontrol (29%), and push-pull (21%). Studies evaluating the technical performance of biocontrol interventions dominated (73%), with a regional clustering of push-pull studies in Kenya. We found an absence of interdisciplinary studies that addressed the wider indirect benefits of not using chemical pesticides, the social-economic outcomes, and barriers to adoption by farmers, which we argue are necessary to identify pathways to greater adoption and to support policy advocacy of biocontrol interventions in SSA.
![]()
The meta-analysis showed that biocontrol interventions effectively reduced pest abundance and crop damage by over 50%, while increasing yield by more than 60%. The substantial yield increase that biocontrol can provide could have an enormous impact on sub-Saharan food security if these practices are scaled up to regional level. Crucially, we showed comparable performance of biocontrol and synthetic pesticides on pest abundance, crop damage and yield, and a significant reduction in the loss of natural enemies, particularly following botanical pesticides application.


REFERENCES
Ratto, F. (2022). Biological control interventions and botanical pesticides for insect pests of crops in sub-Saharan Africa: A mapping review. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6, Article 883975. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.883975
Ratto, F., Bruce, T., Chipabika, G., Mwamakamba, S., Mkandawire, R., Khan, Z., Mkindi, A., Pittchar, J., Sallu, S. M., Whitfield, S., Wilson, K., & Sait, S. M. (2022). Biological control interventions reduce pest abundance and crop damage while maintaining natural enemies in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences, 289(1988). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1695