Skip to main content

Secret Power

Secret Power

Investigating the Legimitization of Criminal Governance: Group Comparisons and Within-Individual Dynamics

Project Overview 

Criminal organisations such as mafias, large gangs and other criminal groups pose not only a significant security and economic threat but also wield substantial social and political influence. These groups have the ability to assert political control over the territories they operate in, imposing their own norms and influencing social interactions. Despite their profound impact, communities often hesitate to resist these criminal entities or collaborate with legal authorities in efforts to counter them.

To explain the ability of criminal groups to wield power, social scientists often reference codes like "omertà" (the law of silence), anti-snitching norms, or the 'Code of the street.' These codes act as barriers that deter communities from cooperating with law enforcement or reporting criminal activities. Nevertheless, the socio-psychological dynamics that underlie these codes remain unknown.

The project ‘Secret Power’ pioneers a new multimethod approach that addresses how ideologies, values and identities may foster criminal groups' capacity to wield power in society. The project aims to transform the scientific understanding of criminal governance, providing strong quantitative evidence that can substantiate policy recommendations and educational interventions.

The project has been awarded a European Research Council – Starting Grant (ERC-StG). The overall funding is €1,499,818.00 (funded by UKRI).

     

 

Geographical Context

Criminal groups exert their impact on communities worldwide, and this project will embark on its initial investigation in three distinct countries: Italy, Japan, and the UK. Each of these nations presents instances of criminal governance in unique ways. For instance, Italy is home to 'traditional' mafia-type groups, renowned for their capacity to exert quasi-political influence. Meanwhile, Japan houses the Yakuza, an equally substantial, well-structured, and hierarchically organized criminal organization deeply entrenched within the community. In the UK, a larger number of smaller criminal groups, including crime firms and gangs, possess less influence over institutional bodies but grapple with the challenge of asserting control over specific territories.

Furthermore, all three of these countries are characterized by a notably robust presence of the state. Consequently, this project aims to explore how individuals respond to illegal political power within contexts marked by the coexistence of conflicting legal and illegal institutions, both competing to secure cooperation and garner consensus.

The project's global scope will enable us to evaluate cultural differences and similarities in how people assess the power of criminal groups.

                                         

 

The global reach of the project will also allow us to assess cultural differences and similarities in how people appraise the power of criminal groups. 

Work Packages

The project is organized in three Work Packages, each with its own milestones and goals.

Preparatory Work Package

Our first objective is to develop a measure of individuals' perceptions of criminal governance that can be applied across various countries, contexts, and types of criminal groups. This measurement tool will empower us to conduct meaningful cross-country comparisons, shedding light on how individuals from diverse nations perceive the political influence of criminal groups and the circumstances under which they are more inclined to accept it.

Work Package 1

This phase of the project is dedicated to data collection through comprehensive population surveys across multiple countries. It will specifically target a cross-section of geographical subunits in Italy, the UK and Japan, allowing us to analyze the complex interplay between individual-level, area-level, and structural-level factors in how individuals perceive criminal groups' political power. Additionally, within this work package, we will conduct experimental studies to investigate the factors that contribute to the preservation of the legitimacy of criminal governance across different countries.

Work Package 2

This phase of the project centers on adolescence, a pivotal stage in the development of attitudes toward authorities. Longitudinal studies will be carried out in communities marked by a significant presence of criminal groups. These studies will delve into the dynamics within individuals, forecasting the legitimization of both legal and criminal forms of governance. By focusing on this critical age group and conducting research in high-crime areas, we aim to gain valuable insights into the factors that influence young people's perceptions of authority, both legal and illicit.

Project Updates

There are no current events

Travaglino, G. A. & Drury, L. (2020). The secret power of criminal organizations: A social psychological approach. New York: Springer.

Drury, L. & Travaglino, G. A. (2020). Demobilising by legitimising: Masculine honour, positive and negative Contact, and social activism against criminal organisations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. doi: 10.1177/1368430219842917 [full text]

Poppi, F. I. M., Travaglino, G. A., & Di Piazza, S. (2018). Talis pater, talis filius: the role of discursive strategies, thematic narratives and ideology in Cosa Nostra. Critical Discourse Studies. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2018.1477685 [full text]

Travaglino, G. A. & Abrams, D. (2019). How criminal organisations exert secret power over communities: An intracultural appropriation theory of cultural values and norms. European Review of Social Psychology, 30, 74-122. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2019.1621128 [full text]

Travaglino, G. A. & Drury, L. (2019). Connected guys: Endorsement of masculine honour predicts more frequent contact with members of criminal organisations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 157-168. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2389 [full text]

Travaglino, G. A., Abrams, D., & Russo, G. (2017). Dual routes from social identity to collective opposition against criminal organisations: Intracultural appropriation theory and the roles of honour codes and social change beliefs. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi: 10.1177/1368430216682351 [full text]

Travaglino, G. A., Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., & Russo, G. (2015). That is how we do it around here: Levels of identification, masculine honor, and social activism against organized crime in the south of Italy. European Journal of Social Psychology. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2100 [full text]

Travaglino, G. A., Abrams, D., & Randsley de Moura, G. (2014). Men of honor don’t talk: The relationship between masculine honor and social activism against criminal organizations in Italy. Political Psychology. doi: 10.1111/pops.12226 [full text]

Related topics

Explore Royal Holloway