Skip to main content

Why Theresa May's gamble at the polls failed

  • Date26 July 2017

Analysis of the result of the 2017 General Election by experts at the University of Kent and Royal Holloway, University of London has examined why Theresa May’s gamble at the polls in June backfired.

It found:

  • May’s strategy of courting UKIP in 2015 backfired, losing London and Southern seats
  • Appealing to a narrower band of white, older, pro-Brexit voters cost support in areas which were younger, more ethnically diverse and highly educated

In their article, The 2017 General Election, Brexit and the Return to Two-Party Politics in Political Quarterly, Professor Oliver Heath, Royal Holloway, University of London andProfessor Matthew Goodwin, University of Kent, analysed election data.

Oliver Heath

Professor Oliver Heath

 

Although they found Theresa May’s strategy did win considerable support from the key social groups it had been directed toward (white, older, pro-Brexit, working-class), her strategy of aggressively courting the 2015 UKIP vote backfired. This was at least partially responsible for the Conservative Party losing seats, particularly in London, the South East and the South West.

Labour, meanwhile, managed to attract support from a broader coalition and one that is not in as distinct social groups as the Conservative Party’s. The gains Labour made came from a variety of different sources.

Jeremy Corbyn’s acceptance of Brexit while wanting to protect jobs does not appear to have cost Labour votes in areas that had voted for Brexit, and was simultaneously a much more popular option in the younger and more diverse areas that had voted to Remain in the EU.

Labour’s impressive performance also appears to have been helped by an increase in turnout, which changed the composition of voters. Turnout was higher in younger and more ethnically diverse seats, and where there were larger numbers of graduates.

Labour also benefited from a consolidation of the anti-Tory vote, particularly from the Liberal Democrats and the Greens.

Published in Political Quarterly, the report focused mainly on England and Wales, as a different set of factors are important in Scotland, where the SNP is dominant and the issue of independence is more salient.

Professor Heath, along with Royal Holloway colleague Dr Kaat Smets, was recently appointed editor of sector-leading journal Electoral Studies. The pair belong to the Elections and Democracy Centre, Part of the Department of Politics and International Relations.

Find out more about the Democracy and Elections Centre, and our new Elections, Campaigns and Democracy MSc. at the the Department of Politics and International Relations.

Explore Royal Holloway

Get help paying for your studies at Royal Holloway through a range of scholarships and bursaries.

There are lots of exciting ways to get involved at Royal Holloway. Discover new interests and enjoy existing ones

Heading to university is exciting. Finding the right place to live will get you off to a good start

Whether you need support with your health or practical advice on budgeting or finding part-time work, we can help

Discover more about our 21 departments and schools

Find out why Royal Holloway is in the top 25% of UK universities for research rated ‘world-leading’ or ‘internationally excellent’

Royal Holloway is a research intensive university and our academics collaborate across disciplines to achieve excellence.

Discover world-class research at Royal Holloway

Discover more about who we are today, and our vision for the future

Royal Holloway began as two pioneering colleges for the education of women in the 19th century, and their spirit lives on today

We’ve played a role in thousands of careers, some of them particularly remarkable

Find about our decision-making processes and the people who lead and manage Royal Holloway today